Switching Restaurant POS Without Losing a Service: A Migration Checklist
What to move, what to leave behind, and how to change systems without a disastrous first Friday night.
Most restaurants know their food cost percentage to the month. Very few know it to the dish. The difference matters, because an average hides the items that are quietly losing money on every sale.
A physical count tells you what is in the store today. Useful, but on its own it cannot tell you whether the amount you used was the amount you should have used.
For that you need two numbers. Actual usage is opening stock plus purchases minus closing stock. Theoretical usage is what your sales say you should have consumed, given the recipes. Where those two diverge, something is happening: over-portioning, waste, spoilage, staff meals not recorded, or theft.
Without recipes, you only ever have the first number, and no way to know whether it is reasonable.
Recipe-mapping the entire menu at once is how this project dies. Start where the money is.
Run an item-wise sales report for the last quarter and sort by revenue. Your top twenty items almost certainly account for most of your covers. Map those first. You will get the majority of the benefit from a fraction of the work, and the exercise gets easier as you build a library of ingredients and units.
Be honest about quantities. A recipe that says 150g of chicken when the kitchen actually plates 190g will show a variance that is really a data problem, and you will waste a week chasing a phantom.
Raw purchase weight is not usable weight. You buy a whole fish and use perhaps half of it. You buy onions by the sack and lose skin, ends and the occasional bad one.
Your costing needs to account for yield, or every dish involving trimmed produce will look cheaper than it is. Where possible, cost from the usable quantity rather than the purchased quantity.
Batch prep deserves its own handling. If your kitchen makes twenty litres of gravy on Monday that feeds dishes all week, treating each portion as if it were made from raw ingredients at the point of sale gets messy. A batch recipe lets you produce the gravy once, book it into stock as its own item, and have individual dishes draw from it.
Weekly counts on high-value and fast-moving items — proteins, dairy, alcohol. Monthly counts on everything else. Re-cost your top items whenever a major ingredient price moves, and at least quarterly.
The goal is not a perfect number. It is a number consistent enough that a change in it means something.
Inventory items carry categories and units of measure, with stock tracked per branch and a full movement history. Recipes link menu items to their ingredients so that selling a dish draws the ingredients down automatically, and batch recipes cover prep made ahead. Purchase orders and supplier records keep the buying side in the same system, and the inventory and batch reports give you consumption and valuation without a spreadsheet.
It varies widely by format — a bar runs very differently from a full-service kitchen — so the useful benchmark is your own trend rather than an industry figure. What matters more is the gap between theoretical and actual usage, which is where waste and pilferage show up regardless of your headline percentage.
Actual usage is opening stock plus purchases minus closing stock. Theoretical usage is what your recipes say your sales should have consumed. A persistent gap between them points to over-portioning, waste, unrecorded staff meals or theft.
No, and trying to is why these projects stall. Run an item-wise sales report, map your top twenty items by revenue first, and extend from there. Those items usually account for most of your covers and therefore most of your food cost.
Cloud restaurant POS with billing, kitchen tickets, QR menus, recipe-level inventory and 20+ reports — running in the browser on the hardware you already have.
What to move, what to leave behind, and how to change systems without a disastrous first Friday night.
Terminals, thermal printers, cash drawers and customer displays — what actually matters, and where you can safely spend less.
QR ordering saves labour when it is set up properly and annoys guests when it is not. The practical differences.